Johannes Vermeer 1632 to 1675, The Love Letter 1669/70
Slide 1. The Love Letter 1669/70 Rijksmuseum Amsterdam
The Love Letter is one of a series of paintings by Vermeer dealing with love and in particular the love letter being received or written by a well to do young woman. This composition is noted as marking the beginning of his late stylistic development in which simplified figures are shown in intensified colour and crisply defined light.
I will trace the development of the theme of love and the related topics of music and domesticity and the letter in the work of Vermeer placing it in the context of Dutch 17th Century painting and finally return to The Love Letter in the light of this background.
Johannes Vermeer was painting The Love Letter in Delft when Rembrandt died in Amsterdam in 1669. His life coincided with the golden century of Dutch art although very little is known about his connections with other artists and thinkers.
At the close of the 16th C. William (the silent) of Orange was successful in expelling the Spanish from the Netherlands heralding in a new period of optimism and prosperity. Holland was a seafaring nation with a strong interest in the expansion of trade which placed them in direct competition with their Spanish masters. Once they gained their independance affluence quickly followed. William had chosen Delft as his home base during the war with Spain and the city remained associated with the prestige of the house of Orange and with the heroic struggle.
Slide 2. View of Delft 1660/61 Mauritshaus the Hague
Delft was a medieval walled city surrounded by water which was why it appealed to William as a fortress. This scene shows the water gate to the city and the brightly lit spire behind it is the New Church in which William was buried. The tomb became a major tourist attraction even in the 17th C. along with the old buildings and many canals that characterised the town.
The wealth of the city continued to grow through trade and local industries including the famous Delftware, tapestry, weaving and brewing. This was periodically interrupted by the endemic European wars of the 17th C Holland managed to be at loggerheads with England and France at the same time.
Break off to Describe the changes to the perspective and composition introduce the camera obscura debate and mention the texture of the paint. ( Rembrandt)
Reynier Jansz and Digna Baltens had their son Johannes baptised in the New Church, 31/10/1632. Reynier was a weaver but also registered as an art dealer with the St Lukes Guild of Delft. He carried on his business from a pub and by 1641 he had leased an inn in a prime site on the market square of Delft.
In 1652 Reynier died leaving his successful business to Johannes who may have carried on the trade although not much is known about his practice. On 29th December 1653 he registered himself as an artist with the Guild. Presumably therefore he had been training since the mid 1640s however no record of his study has so far come to light.
It is not known if he travelled to Italy or even to other cities in Holland but it is probable that he did because Delft was not a great art centre. There are remarkably few documents which might have given us a clue to his private or professional life. This is strange in a society which drafted contracts for everything. Rembrandt was always writing letters, being taken to court signing loan forms and otherwise leaving a trail of evidence. Vermeer, by contrast, left a virtual silence.
Two artists Leonard Bramer and Gerard ter Borch co-signed Vermeer�s wedding certificate but no further record of contact with them survives. Arnold Bon wrote a poem after the death of Fabritius in the great gunpowder explosion in which he cites Vermeer as rising from the ashes! However there is no record of their having been master and pupil or ever having met.
Jan Steen and Pieter de Hooch ( Hogh)were both active in Delft in the 1650s and there are several paintings by Vermeer and de Hooch which are very close to each other in design. Experts have varied in their attribution of precedence but today the quality of Vermeer�s paintings appears outstanding for its psychological quality and its timelessness even if the composition is copied.
In 1653 Vermeer married Catherina Bolnes whose mother Maria Thins was a devout catholic closely associated with the Jesuit society. He converted to the Catholic faith before the marriage and seems to have embraced it fervently. Maria had a very substantial collection of art including works from the Utrecht school which was more influenced by the Italians and Flemish art than anything from Delft. Some of these paintings found their way into Vermeer�s compositions such as Dirk Van Baburen� s The Procuress in Vermeer�s A lady seated at a Virginal, 1675.
Slide 3. A Lady Seated at a Virginal, 1675. National Gallery London
In spite of this poor material record It is not entirely true that Vermeer was overlooked as an artist until modern times. He did have a select band of admiring collectors throughout the 18th and 19th Centuries It is true however that he was not generally accepted as the star he is today till late last century.
There could be a number of reasons for this including a formal and iconographic innovation in Vermeer�s work that may have been out of step with his peers. This will become apparent as we look through some key examples of his paintings.
In his life time however he was obviously recognised at least in his home town of Delft. We do know that in 1662 he was elected as one of the heads of St Lukes Guild and was re-elected for a second term two years later. Huygens the famous art adviser sent several important overseas collectors to look at Vermeer�s paintings which it seems were never in great supply.
In 1672 Vermeer was invited to the Hague as a leading expert in Italian painting. This could also suggest that he had been travelling. But he could have acquired this knowledge as a dealer.
Vermeer�s financial affairs were not a great success it seems because he borrowed considerable sums of money to get through the French war with Louis 14th who invaded in 1672 with disastrous consequences for this trading city and for this art dealer in particular. In spite of this he does not seem to have taken on commissions or to have painted the popular portraits which kept Rembrandt out of the courts most of the time. When he died in 1675 he left behind 10 children of school age and considerable debt which had to be recovered by the sale of his stock including a number of his own paintings yet once again the paper work is sparse.
One interesting thing that is known is that his executor was Anthony Van Leeuwenhoek ( Laywenhook) the Microscopist from Delft. It is likely that Anthony was a friend of Johannes who also had an interest in optics and science which Anthony may have helped him with. It is considered likely that the Geographer and the Astronomer are both modelled on Leeuwenhoek.
Slide 4. The Geographer 1668/69 Stadel, Frankfurt Slide 5 The Astronomer 1668 Louvre Paris
Vermeer�s interest in optics and in particular the camera obscura has had an important effect on his painting. Not as has sometimes been speculated as a means of determining the perspective and outlines of objects since, we will see how Vermeer constantly adjusted compositions on the canvas and changed the lighting and perspective for psychological effect. However the particular luminosity of Camera Obscura images and certain optical effects were important. In Woman with a red hat for example the halation of highlights is typical of the effect of an unfocused camera obscura image and is not visible to the naked eye.
Slide 6. The Girl with a Red Hat 1665 National Gallery Washington.
Vermeer�s interest in philosophy and science including, cartography, Optics, astronomy, music is not only technical it relates to a metaphysical system concerned with measuring the harmony of the universe and other neoplatonic ideas which were current at the time.
This metaphysics in conjunction with the Jesuit influence of Maria Thins may shed some light on the direction of Vermeer�s paintings and may also explain some of the ways in which he diverged from Dutch Protestant attitudes.
His interest in perspective will be seen to be partly about the technical illusionism popular in Holland at the time but we will see how Vermeer modified these illusions in order to privilege psychological and iconographic content.
Vermeer made no surviving studies or sketches which added to the camera obscura theory however there is now concrete evidence of his use of traditional perspective systems and of a development in the sophistication of these methods over the years.
Slide 7. Perspective diagrams
In the earlier works the distance points were closer to the vanishing point making the viewing angle rather wide. This led to distortion of diagonally placed tiles as for example in The Girl With a Wineglass 1659/60. Brunswick.
Slide 8. The Girl With a Wineglass 1659/60 Brunswick.
Many of the paintings reveal evidence of his using a pin at the vanishing point and making perspective lines with a chalk line. Eg. The love letter.
Slide 9. The Love Letter ----------------------------------------------------------- Dutch Genre in the mid- 1650s In 1650 the rather dull artistic traditions of Delft were enlivened by a dynamic new style of architecture painting. Gerard Houckgeest, (Hookjjaist) Emannuel de Witte Hendrick Van Vleit and Fabritius all arrived in town around 1650. In particular this can be seen in the paintings of the Old and New Churches.
Slide 10. Gerald Houckgeest Interior of The New Church at Delft 1651.
Note the unusual vantage points and strong use of chiaroscuro and the presence of figures to emphasise scale and highten the emotional effect of the scene.
History painting held the highest status of all subjects for the Dutch in the 17th C and we will see how Vermeer began his career by painting such subjects influenced by the Italian and Flemish works found in his mother in Law�s collection but he quickly adopted the current vogue for local genre scenes however he transported his metaphysical concerns from religious subjects into the vernacular. This merger may lie at the heart of Vermeer�s difference.
Jan Steen and Pieter de Hooch arrived in Delft in the mid 1650s and clearly contributed to the move towards local realist topics. Hooch and Vermeer often shared very similar compositions and perspectival structures.
Slide 11. Pieter de Hooch A Courtyard with a Servant Cleaning Fish 1655
This is typical of many De Hooch paintings of everyday life. The textures of the pavement and brickwork are meticulously rendered providing local colour for the presentation of the figures.
Slide 12. The Little Street 1657/58 Rijksmuseum
This is not as direct a presentation of the little street as it might appear. The whitewash is a device to highlight the figures while separating the two textures of paving and brick. The houses are cut off at the edges confirming that it is a setting for the human action rather than an architectural painting.
The vines are an emblem of love, fidelity and domestic virtue. Emblems are much in use in Dutch painting at the time and there were manuals to guide artists in their use although there was some slippage in the language used. Vermeer often used them as we will see.
In this painting he changes from the broad sweep of the history painting to the detailed brushmarks typical of his later works. The overall message of the picture would seem to be diligent domestic virtue.
This move by some artists to realist subjects was criticised by some as moving from the general to the particular and therefore loosing the timeless quality art should aspire to. Gerard de Lairesse was particularly scathing of realism for this reason although three hundred years later Vermeer looks totally timeless.
Van Meegeren�s forgeries of Vermeer look quite wrong today although they seemed all right to contemporaries of the forger in the 1930s. This implies that every age sees things in its own image anyway and timelessness resides in more abstract qualities such as the rendering of light compositional devices and an empathic vision.
A particular target for criticism was the fashion of showing the wealthy young things of the day at play. The Flappers of 17th C. Delft were known as Juffers and their dandies as Jonkers. Jan Sysmus derided Vermeer for portraying Jonkers and Juffers in all his paintings
Slide 13. The Officer and Laughing Girl 1658 Frick Slide 14 The Glass of Wine 1658 Berlin
Slide 15 Pieter de Hooch The favourite Parrot 1673 for comparison
It is noteworthy that Vermeer almost always painted young people and most often women. Out of the 36 odd paintings surviving 16 have Juffers with or without servants and only one painting, The Procuress shows an older person. This is a transitional painting between the style of the history paintings and the domestic scenes.
Slide 16. The Procuress 1656 Dresden
Vermeer hardly ever painted dogs or children which most of his peers always fitted in. This might be particularly surprising given that he had 10 children at the time of his death. ------------------------------------------------------------------- The history paintings are interesting for the Catholic orientation they convey.
Slide 17. St Praxedis 1655
This was copied almost exactly from Felice Fichereli known as Riposo the original being painted in Italy in 1640/45. The main difference from the Italian painting is the addition of the crucifix which symbolically combines the blood of the martyr with that of Christ. It is painted two years after his conversion and is a very Catholic subject to chose. It also reinforces the belief that Vermeer had access to Italian painting
Technically it is interesting because Vermeer has used a technique not common in Holland. The soft luminosity of the red dress comes from a glaze of Madder over lead white. Vermeer often used thin glazes to achieve surprisingly strong colours throughout his career.
Slide 18. Christ in The House of Martha and Mary 1655 Edinburgh
In this story Christ favours the contemplative Mary over the outraged worker Martha. This could be thought of as epitomising the different world views of Catholic and Protestant in 17th C. Holland. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Domestic harmony
Slide 19 The Milk Maid 1658/60 Rijksmuseum
This is a picture of moral authority. Notice the low eye level which casts the figure as heroic. The sturdy maid is diligently performing her duties to sustain the household. The composition was simplified during painting by removing a basket of laundry and replacing it with the small foot warmer. The foot warmer signified a lovers desire for constancy and devotion. Which conforms exactly with the mood that surrounds the maid herself. It also makes room for us to see the little frieze of cupids which often appear in Vermeer�s paintings.
A wall map was also removed along with other hanging objects to create a calm and dignified frame for the maid. The play of light on the wall which was cleared for the purpose is not entirely logical it has been modified to oppose the light falling on the maid to give her additional presence. There is also a white line drawn all the way down her back which strengthens the image further while giving her luminosity.
Slide 20. The Lace Maker 1669/70 Louvre
This is another scene of absorption in the task at hand
Slide 21 Woman Holding a Balance 1664 Washington
Note the Last Judgment on the wall behind, Judging and weighing the scales must relate to the search for a moderate life in hope of salvation.
Her body is placed to bind her with the judgment her head associated with the Mandorla of Christ and her hand at the corner of the painting. The mirror suggests self contemplation and assessment rather than vanity.
She could almost be taken for the Virgin Mary.
The following two images relate to the toilet of the Juffer.
Slide 22. Young Woman with a Pearl Necklace 1664 Berlin
This is an extraordinary animated image Vermeer removed a map from the wall and some furnishings to allow this electric spark to flash between the eye of the girl and the mirror. There is no possibility of reading this as a vanitas since the innocence and purity of the gaze is undeniable. The mirror can be vanitas but it also exists as a symbol of truth the clear and true mirror or Veritas.
Slide 23. Young Woman with a Water Pitcher 1664/65 Metropolitan, Hand washing and purity? _____________________________________________ Music and love
Two other themes which relate directly to The Love Letter are Music and the Letter. In Dutch painting there is a strong link between them since the letter in the hands of a Juffer may usually be presumed to be a love letter and music is associated with hearts beating in harmony and with solace. Vermeer usually gives us an additional clue sometimes in the painting on the wall behind the protagonists.
Slide 24. A Lady at The Virginal with a Gentleman 1662/63 The Queen Otherwise The music lesson but this is a Jonker rather than a music teacher. Their poses have been changed see her head in the mirror , he also used to lean inwards. This statuesque pose seems to connote stability in the relationship rather than a dynamic.
Also not the easel in the mirror identifying the place of the artist
It is interesting to note how Vermeer has changed the shadow from the window so that the top shadow is removed to create a clear light space and the other shadows are at a different angle to allow a compositional link with the virginal.
The Latin text on the lid reads, Music is the companion of joy balm of sorrow
The Bass viol was added after the rest was finished and probably signifies two instruments reverberating in harmony, Ie two hearts.
Slide 25. A Lady Standing at a Virginal 1670/72 National, London
Note the Cupid painting and the skirting board.
Slide 26 The Guitar Player 1670 Kenwood
There was a copy of this which was taken as the original for many years. It was modernised by the copyist by removing the curls which were considered too unfashionable in the years after Vermeer painted it.
Slide 27. Woman With a Lute 1664 Metropolitan
The Love Letter
Slide 28. Woman in Blue Reading a Letter 1662/64 Rijksmuseum
This is a beautiful luminous painting which evokes a powerful empathic response from the viewer. The woman is totally absorbed in the letter her elbows drawn up in anticipation and her mouth slightly open.
Vermeer made several adjustments to the composition to highten the emotional effect. The rod which holds the map runs directly behind the hands clutching the letter. The edge of the map was extended some distance after the wall had been finished to maximise this tension. The back of the coat was trimmed down from an earlier flare at the back and the trim of fur was removed.
It is probable that this indicates a change of colour scheme also because the fur trimmed jacket is either dark blue or yellow. The clothes and furnishings shown in the paintings are all mentioned in the list of his effects. The softly luminous blue of the jacket is actually achieved with hardly any ultramarine pigment at all. The coat is modelled in ochre and black and then very thinly glazed in blue.
The same transparent blue glaze is also used to make the shadows.of the chair and the map. Transparency here imitates the effect of light and shadow.
The nails on the chair are another example of the technique. They were first painted a pale yellow and then modelled with a transparent dark glaze to give the shadow. They were finished off with a blob of yellow paint as a highlight. This reverses Rembrandt�s technique where the shadow is established in the underpainting and often remains untouched throughout the rest of the process.
Note that she casts no shadow at all thereby singling her out from the material space. At the same time the three rectangular blocks of white wall are harmoniously proportioned and relate top the figure in such a way as to lock her into a formal harmony giving the scene a tranquil stability and timelessness.
Vermeer differs from his contemporaries whose chief aim was to deceive the eye into thinking this was reality. Vermeer does not deny the two dimensional surface of the painting and furthermore manipulates reality for psychological effect.
Slide 29. A Lady Writing 1665 Washington
The painting on the wall behind the lady is a still life of musical instruments. This also signifies that the letter is a love letter. Unlike most of the single women in these paintings this one looks out at the artist/viewer with a tender smile It is possible that this is Catherina Bolnes Vermeer�s wife.
Slide 30 A Girl Reading a Letter at an Open Window 1657 Dresden
Note the reflection in the window. Also the horizon line used to coincide with a painting of Cupid which he later removed to give more emphasis to the girl and the play of light.
Slide 31. A Lady Writing a Letter With Her Maid 1670/72 Dublin
The painting on the wall is The Finding of Moses In 17th C. Holland this old testament story would have also been associated with the coming of Christ and the guidance of divine providence. It may suggest that the letter being written affords God�s protection of the loved one.
Slide 32. Mistress and Maid 1667/68 Frick
This painting has a different mood from the light filled paintings we have been looking at. The contemplative atmosphere has been interrupted by an element of anxiety. The dark background focuses our attention entirely onto the exchange between the two women.
Slide 33. The Love Letter 1669/70 Rijksmuseum.
This painting was first recorded in 1892 when it was sold as part of the Messchert Van Vollenhoven collection in Amsterdam. It was acquired through the Rembrandt society for a fictitious sum of 41,000 guilders but in fact this was a show bid - it had been secured some days before at 15,000. It was subsequently presented to the Rijksmuseum 1893.
In 1971 it was stolen after being cut out of its frame and later restored to the museum with the edges missing and some damage to one corner.
This composition is unusual in the use of a doorway to frame the figure. De Hooch made a very similar painting ( A couple with Parrot) about a year earlier and they probably communicated about the problems of perspective and framing in the composition. De Hooch also used the broom and curtain to reinforce the separation of the viewer from the tableau where the action is played out.
It is possible that familiarity with camera obscura may also have played a part in the construction of the two spaces. It would be normal for a camera obscura to be built in a darkened room and to focus onto a brightly lit scene. It is clear however that the composition was not created using the camera since this is one painting in which the perspective lines have been shown to be derived from a pin and chalk line by x-ray and spectrographic testing.
The paint technique corresponds with Vermeer�s normal combination of imprimatura and glaze. The maids dress for example is modelled in white with a little blue then glazed with ultramarine. This ultramarine extends under the lute as shadow where there was originally a napkin on her lap.
The vanishing point for the composition falls in the viewer�s space just above the finial of the chair. This enhances the sense of separation between rooms. In the de Hooch the doorway seems to be a play on perspective and a witty reference to the viewer�s coming across a scene unobserved, rather like the keyhole realism of Degas, Bonnard and Vuillard in the 19th and 20th C.. As we may have come to expect with Vermeer, however, the device has become more Psychological.
The human interaction which is the core of the composition takes place in a bright room but the viewer is positioned in the dark anteroom. There are signs of disorder and neglect in the darkened space and signs of severe damp on the wall below the map on the left. This kind of gloomy detail is most unusual with Vermeer.
The contrast is all the more severe since the wall behind the Juffer and her maid reveals great affluence. The wall is tooled gilt over leather and the marble and wood mantelpiece are far more extravagant than the normal interior represented by Vermeer. This part of the picture is detailed with firm clarity using several layers of paint - the anteroom, however, is loosely sketched in with a few lines and washes such as the scarf which is thrown over the back of the chair.
As with Mistress and Maid at the Frick there is an element of anxiety in the exchange between the mistress and the maid who interrupts her music to bring the love letter. Playing the cittern as we have seen is usually associated with harmonious love in Vermeer�s paintings. The Juffer must have been musing on her lovers constancy when the unexpected letter arrives, what could be the source of her obvious anxiety?
The trace of tasks left incomplete and the disorder of the anteroom may be a reflection on the contrast between the material wealth and security of the mistress and the internal insecurity she seems to experience regarding her lover. The two rooms may therefore be thought of as a psychological model for the inner and outer worlds experienced by an individual.
The maid however has a reassuring smile for her mistress. To confirm the good news Vermeer has given us additional emblems. The painting behind her depicts a ship in calm seas signifying a lover searching for a safe harbour and the idyllic landscape painting above reinforces the positive message so everything comes out all right in the end.
|